Name: KÁTIA REGINA GIESEN
Publication date: 04/02/2022
Advisor:
Name |
Role |
|---|---|
| LENI RIBEIRO LEITE | Advisor * |
Examining board:
| Name |
Role |
|---|---|
| GILVAN VENTURA DA SILVA | External Alternate * |
| LENI RIBEIRO LEITE | Advisor * |
| RAIMUNDO NONATO BARBOSA DE CARVALHO | Internal Alternate * |
Summary: This dissertation presents and discusses Pliny the Younger`s conceptions about the constitution,
style, and function of encomia as part of the epideictic genre of Rhetoric, based on a selection
of epistles from the Letters of Pliny the Younger and on the text of the Panegyric to Trajan.
Although there is evidence of a ascension of laudatory eloquence during the 1st and 2nd
centuries AD, a process to which Pliny greatly contributed by adopting this type of speech as a
legitimate form of expression and by using it frequently in his writings, there are no sources at
the time discussing the subject as a treatise or at a rhetorical level. Therefore, this work aims to
provide a potential theory of laudatory epideictic in Pliny, not written by him but inscribed in
his oeuvre, by reading the authors texts in light of ancient theories and practices of encomium,
and by using the concepts of Discourse Analysis as stated by Dominique Maingueneau. As a
result, this study proposes that, in terms of structures and themes, the encomiastic practice
suggested by Pliny maintains a somewhat traditional pattern seen in the third genre of oratory,
but undergoing specific adaptations to the circumstances of production and publication of each
text. Nevertheless, the Letters and the Panegyric constantly employ an encomiastic vocabulary,
albeit not necessarily technical, which points to an ongoing debate on the applicability of these
praises, their functions, their purposes, and the conditions of the audiences reception, by
opening meta- and interdiscursive fissures. This study concludes that the collection of Plinys
letters redefines a variety of encomia belonging to oratory, epistolary and poetic practices
based on the circumstances of production and circulation of the letters, but it also presents a
debate about legitimation via political, social, and literary relationships. That is, via praise of
various characters, these epideictic exchanges allow Pliny to build a discursive authority that is
paramount to the same laudatory practices and to the collective bonds in which it participates.
The gratiarum actio, on other hand, is creative work that gives new meaning and function to
this type of speech. In addition to being a public speech determined by institutional demand and
fulfilled by the consul in the senate house, the speech is itself a kind of treatise on the ideal
values of a good Roman imperial ruler; it is likewise a practical example of the type of oratory
that can be used to address that same autocratic model. Hence, with abundant praise, full of
amplification, claimed as sincere, and built on a series of comparisons, Pliny responds not only
to the obligation imposed by the consulate but to the transition of dynasties and the need of
legitimating the new ruler.
